The figure that is not a direct manifestation of the quantum nature of atom is:
Structure of Atom · Class 11 · JEE Main Previous Year Question
The figure that is not a direct manifestation of the quantum nature of atom is:
- a
- b
- c
- d✓
🧠 The Line of Evidence Three major phenomena "broke" classical physics and proved that energy and light are quantized: the Photoelectric Effect, Black Body Radiation, and Atomic Line Spectra.
🗺️ TheMANIFESTATION Audit
- Option A/B/C: These typically represent the discrete curves of Black Body intensity, the voltage-cutoff of Photoelectricity, and the sharp spikes of Line Spectra. All are direct proofs of quantization.
- Option D: Usually represents a classical continuous phenomenon, such as a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution or a generic wave property like intensity vs. distance, which don't require "energy packets" to explain.
⚡ The "Gaps" vs "Slides" Hook Quantum nature implies the world has "steps" (like stairs). Classical nature implies "slopes" (like a slide). Any graph showing a smooth, predictable slope without a threshold or discrete spikes is not a quantum proof.
⚠️ Common Traps Make sure to look at the exact labels of the graphs (e.g., vs. or vs. ).
Practice this question with progress tracking
Want timed practice with adaptive difficulty? Solve this question (and hundreds more from Structure of Atom) inside The Crucible, our adaptive practice platform.
More JEE Main Structure of Atom PYQs
The minimum energy that must be possessed by photons to produce the photoelectric effect with platinum metal is: [threshold frequency = 1.31015 s-1, h=6.610-34 Js]
What is the work function of the metal if the light of wavelength 4000 Å generates photoelectrons of velocity 6105 ms-1 from it? (Mass of electron =910-31 kg, c=3108 ms-1, h=6.62610-34 Js, charge of…
If p is the momentum of the fastest electron ejected from a metal surface after irradiation of light having wavelength , then for 1.5p momentum of the photoelectron, the wavelength of the light…
Which of the graphs shown below does not represent the relationship between incident light and the electron ejected from metal surface?
For electron in '2s' and '2p' orbitals, the orbital angular momentum values, respectively are: