Bohr's Model of the Atom
From Rutherford's problem to quantum orbits — and why Bohr was right for all the wrong reasons
In 1911, a young Danish physicist named Niels Bohr arrived in Cambridge to work with the legendary J.J. Thomson — discoverer of the electron. The collaboration didn't click. Within months, Bohr moved to Manchester to join Ernest Rutherford, who had just unveiled his nuclear model of the atom.
Rutherford's atom had a problem no one could solve: classical physics predicted that an electron orbiting a nucleus should spiral inward and crash into it within a fraction of a nanosecond. Atoms shouldn't exist — yet here we all are.
Bohr spent 1912–1913 combining Rutherford's nuclear model with Planck's quantum idea and Einstein's photon concept. The result — published in 1913 when he was just 27 — was the first model to correctly predict the hydrogen spectrum, every line of it. He received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1922.
To understand where Bohr's model came from, you need to see the chain of ideas he was building on:
Thomson (1897–1904): Discovered the electron and proposed the plum-pudding model — electrons embedded in a diffuse positive sphere. No nucleus. No empty space.
Rutherford (1911): Blew up the plum-pudding model with the gold-foil experiment. Showed that almost all the atom's mass is concentrated in a tiny, dense, positively charged nucleus, and electrons occupy the vast empty space around it. But his model could not explain how electrons stayed in orbit without radiating energy and crashing.
Planck (1900) + Einstein (1905): Energy comes in discrete packets (quanta). Light is not a continuous wave — it consists of photons, each carrying energy .
Bohr's synthesis (1913): Took Rutherford's nuclear structure + Planck–Einstein quantisation + the experimental data on hydrogen's line spectrum, and wove them into a self-consistent model. The key leap: he simply assumed that only certain orbits are allowed — those where the electron's angular momentum is a whole-number multiple of . This assumption had no classical justification. But it worked.

Why Classical Physics Predicts Atoms Cannot Exist
An electron moving in a circular orbit is constantly accelerating toward the nucleus (centripetal acceleration). Maxwell's equations of electrodynamics say that any accelerating charged particle must radiate energy as electromagnetic waves.
If an orbiting electron radiates energy, it slows down. As it slows, it spirals inward. Calculations show it should crash into the nucleus in about seconds — a hundred-millionth of a second.
Atoms have been around for 13.8 billion years. Clearly, something is wrong with applying classical physics here. Bohr's bold fix: declare that certain orbits are forbidden from radiating, simply because their angular momentum satisfies a quantum condition.
Bohr's Four Postulates
Postulate i — Stationary Orbits (Allowed States)
An electron in a hydrogen atom can move around the nucleus in circular paths of fixed radius and fixed energy. These paths are called orbits, stationary states, or allowed energy states. The orbits are arranged concentrically around the nucleus, like rings. As long as the electron stays in one orbit, it neither gains nor loses energy — which is why these are called stationary states (the electron itself still moves, but its energy is stationary).
Postulate ii — No Radiation While in Orbit; Quanta at Transitions
The energy of an electron in an allowed orbit does not change with time — it does not continuously radiate (defying classical electrodynamics). However:
- If the electron absorbs a quantum of energy, it jumps from a lower orbit to a higher orbit (excitation).
- If it falls from a higher orbit to a lower orbit, it emits that exact energy difference as a photon.
Crucially, the energy change does not happen gradually — it is instantaneous and comes in a single quantum. There is no in-between state.
Postulate iii — Bohr's Frequency Rule
When an electron transitions between two stationary states that differ in energy by , the frequency of the photon absorbed or emitted is given by:
Equation 2.10 — Bohr's Frequency Rule
E₁ = energy of the lower stationary state, E₂ = energy of the higher stationary state. h = Planck's constant = 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s. This is why atoms emit only specific frequencies — only specific ΔE values are possible.
Postulate iv — Quantised Angular Momentum (The Key Assumption)
This is the quantum heart of Bohr's model. An electron can only move in orbits where its angular momentum is an integer multiple of .
Recall: for an electron of mass moving in a circular orbit of radius with speed , the moment of inertia is and the angular velocity is , so:
Bohr's quantisation condition says this must equal a whole-number multiple of :
Equation 2.11 — Angular Momentum Quantisation
n is called the Principal Quantum Number. It labels which orbit the electron is in. The smallest allowed orbit is n = 1 (ground state). This equation has no derivation — it was Bohr's postulate, justified only by its results.
AI Generation Prompt
Bohr atomic model diagram for hydrogen. Central nucleus shown as a small bright orange sphere labelled 'Nucleus (+e)'. Surrounding it, four concentric circular orbits drawn as clean white rings, labelled n=1 (innermost), n=2, n=3, n=4 (outermost). A small blue sphere (electron) shown on the n=1 orbit with a curved arrow indicating circular motion. Show one upward transition arrow from n=1 to n=3 with a wavy photon arrow pointing inward (absorption, blue colour, labelled 'Energy absorbed = hν'). Show one downward transition arrow from n=3 to n=2 with a wavy photon arrow pointing outward (emission, red colour, labelled 'Energy emitted = hν'). Label each orbit with its radius: n=1 → a₀=52.9 pm, n=2 → 4a₀, n=3 → 9a₀, n=4 → 16a₀. Dark background, orange accent labels, clean technical illustration style.
Deriving the Key Results
Radius of the nth Orbit
The electron stays in a circular orbit because the electrostatic attraction toward the nucleus exactly provides the centripetal force needed for circular motion:
where is Coulomb's constant and is the electron charge. From Bohr's quantisation (Eq. 2.11):
Substituting (ii) into (i) and solving for gives:
AI Generation Prompt
Blackboard-style step-by-step mathematical derivation of the radius of the nth Bohr orbit. Show all steps clearly written in chalk-style on a dark background. Step 1: Force balance — ke²/r² = m_e v²/r, simplify to ke² = m_e v² r. Step 2: From angular momentum quantization — m_e v r = nh/2π, so v = nh/(2π m_e r). Step 3: Substitute v into force balance — ke² = m_e × [nh/(2π m_e r)]² × r. Step 4: Simplify — ke² = n²h²/(4π² m_e r), so r = n²h²/(4π² m_e ke²). Step 5: Define a₀ = h²/(4π² m_e ke²) = 52.9 pm, so r_n = n² a₀. Box the final result: r_n = n² a₀. Dark background, orange accent labels, clean technical illustration style.
Equation 2.12 — Radius of nth Orbit
a₀ = 52.9 pm is the Bohr radius — radius of the first (ground state) orbit. r₁ = 52.9 pm, r₂ = 4 × 52.9 = 211.6 pm, r₃ = 9 × 52.9 = 476.1 pm. As n increases, the radius grows as n² — so higher orbits are much larger.
The Bohr Radius — Most Stable State
The first orbit () has radius pm. This is called the Bohr orbit or Bohr radius. Under normal conditions, the electron in a hydrogen atom is found in this innermost orbit — the ground state.
As increases: , , . The radius grows as , so the electron moves further from the nucleus at higher orbits. As , — the electron escapes the nucleus (ionisation).
Velocity of the nth Orbit
Now substitute the result back into the quantisation condition :
Substituting the known values of , , and :
AI Generation Prompt
Blackboard-style step-by-step mathematical derivation of the velocity of the nth Bohr orbit. Chalk-style on dark background. Step 1: From angular momentum quantization — v = nh / (2π m_e r). Step 2: Substitute r_n = n² a₀ — v_n = nh / (2π m_e n² a₀) = h / (2π m_e n a₀). Step 3: Substitute values — h = 6.626×10⁻³⁴ J·s, m_e = 9.109×10⁻³¹ kg, a₀ = 52.9×10⁻¹² m. Step 4: Calculate v₁ = 2.18 × 10⁶ m/s. Step 5: General result — v_n = 2.18×10⁶ / n m/s. Observation: velocity decreases as n increases (higher orbits, slower electrons). Box the final result: v_n = 2.18×10⁶ / n m s⁻¹. Dark background, orange accent labels, clean technical illustration style.
Velocity of nth Orbit
v₁ = 2.18 × 10⁶ m/s (about 0.73% the speed of light). v₂ = 1.09 × 10⁶ m/s, v₃ = 0.727 × 10⁶ m/s. Velocity decreases as n increases — electrons in outer orbits move more slowly. Velocity also increases with Z: for hydrogen-like ions, v_n = 2.18 × 10⁶ × Z/n m/s.
Energy of the nth Orbit
The total mechanical energy of the electron is the sum of its kinetic and potential energies. The potential energy is negative (attractive force):
From the force balance, , so :
Substituting and defining :
AI Generation Prompt
Blackboard-style step-by-step derivation of energy of the nth Bohr orbit. Chalk-style writing on dark background. Step 1: Total energy E = KE + PE = (1/2)m_e v² - ke²/r. Step 2: From force balance — ke²/r = m_e v², so KE = (1/2)ke²/r. Step 3: E = (1/2)ke²/r - ke²/r = -ke²/(2r). Step 4: Substitute r_n = n²a₀ — E_n = -ke²/(2n²a₀). Step 5: Define R_H = ke²/(2a₀) = 2.18×10⁻¹⁸ J. Step 6: Final result — E_n = -R_H/n² = -2.18×10⁻¹⁸/n² J. Show energy values: E₁ = -2.18×10⁻¹⁸ J, E₂ = -0.545×10⁻¹⁸ J. Box the result: E_n = -R_H(1/n²). Side note: KE = -E_n (positive), PE = 2E_n (negative), |PE| = 2|KE|. Dark background, orange accent labels, clean technical illustration style.
Equation 2.13 — Energy of nth Orbit
R_H = 2.18 × 10⁻¹⁸ J is the Rydberg constant (energy form). E₁ = -2.18 × 10⁻¹⁸ J (ground state — most negative, most stable). E₂ = -2.18×10⁻¹⁸ × (1/4) = -0.545 × 10⁻¹⁸ J. E_∞ = 0 (ionised hydrogen — electron free from nucleus).
What Does Negative Energy Mean?
The reference point (zero energy) is defined as a free electron at rest, infinitely far from the nucleus (, ).
Extension to Hydrogen-Like Ions
Bohr's model also applies to any ion with just one electron — called hydrogen-like species: (), (), (), etc. The nuclear charge simply replaces in the Coulomb force:
- Energy gets more negative as increases (electron more tightly bound to a higher-charge nucleus)
- Orbit radius gets smaller as increases (stronger pull → smaller orbit)
- Velocity increases with (stronger pull → faster orbit to maintain balance)
Equations 2.14 & 2.15 — Hydrogen-Like Ions
Z = atomic number of the ion. For He⁺ (Z=2): E₁ = -2.18×10⁻¹⁸ × 4 = -8.72×10⁻¹⁸ J (4× more negative than H). For He⁺: r₁ = 52.9/2 = 26.45 pm (half the Bohr radius — tighter orbit).
Explaining the Line Spectrum of Hydrogen
This is Bohr's greatest triumph. The line spectrum — which Balmer and Rydberg described with empirical formulas but could not explain — follows directly from Bohr's energy levels.
When an electron transitions from an initial orbit to a final orbit , the energy difference is:
- Emission (): electron falls to a lower orbit, is negative, energy is released as a photon.
- Absorption (): electron jumps to a higher orbit, is positive, energy is absorbed from a photon.
The frequency and wavenumber of the photon are:
Equations 2.16–2.21 — Transition Energy, Frequency, Wavenumber
The wavenumber 1.09677 × 10⁷ m⁻¹ = 109,677 cm⁻¹ is exactly the Rydberg constant R∞ that Rydberg found empirically in 1888. Bohr derived it from first principles in 1913 — a stunning validation of the model.
Every spectral series of hydrogen is now understood as transitions into a particular final orbit:
- Lyman (): transitions from into the ground state → high-energy UV photons
- Balmer (): transitions from into → visible photons (the four coloured lines Balmer saw)
- Paschen (), Brackett (), Pfund (): infrared photons
The brightness of each spectral line depends on the number of atoms making that particular transition — more atoms making the same jump means a more intense line.
The fact that Bohr's formula gives exactly Rydberg's empirical constant ( m) was electrifying. A formula derived from quantum postulates perfectly matched a constant measured in the lab decades earlier.
Limitations of Bohr's Model
Bohr's model was a brilliant breakthrough, but it came with serious limitations:
1. Fails for multi-electron atoms
Bohr's model works for hydrogen () and hydrogen-like ions (one electron), but breaks down completely for atoms with two or more electrons. Electron–electron repulsions create interactions the model ignores entirely.
2. Cannot explain fine structure of spectral lines
When instruments of higher resolution examine hydrogen's spectral lines, each 'line' is actually a cluster of closely-spaced lines (doublets and triplets). Bohr's model predicts single lines and cannot account for this fine structure.
3. Cannot explain the Zeeman and Stark effects
In a magnetic field, spectral lines split into multiple components (Zeeman effect). In an electric field, they split differently (Stark effect). Bohr's model has no mechanism to explain these splittings.
4. Contradicts Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
The concept of a fixed, well-defined circular orbit implies that you know both the electron's position and momentum simultaneously with perfect precision. Heisenberg proved this is impossible — you cannot know both at once. An orbit is fundamentally a classical concept that doesn't apply to quantum particles.
5. Ignores the wave nature of the electron
de Broglie showed (1924) that electrons have wave properties. A particle with wave nature cannot be confined to a well-defined circular trajectory. Bohr's model treats electrons purely as particles.
6. Cannot explain chemical bonding or molecular shapes
Bohr's model says nothing about how atoms share electrons to form molecules, or why molecules have specific shapes.
Q1.According to Bohr's model, the radius of the 3rd orbit of () is:
In 1911, a young Danish physicist named Niels Bohr arrived in Cambridge to work with the legendary J.J. Thomson — discoverer of the electron. The collaboration didn't click. Within months, Bohr moved to Manchester to join Ernest Rutherford, who had just unveiled his nuclear model of the atom.
Rutherford's atom had a problem no one could solve: classical physics predicted that an electron orbiting a nucleus should spiral inward and crash into it within a fraction of a nanosecond. Atoms shouldn't exist — yet here we all are.
Bohr spent 1912–1913 combining Rutherford's nuclear model with Planck's quantum idea and Einstein's photon concept. The result — published in 1913 when he was just 27 — was the first model to correctly predict the hydrogen spectrum, every line of it. He received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1922.
To understand where Bohr's model came from, you need to see the chain of ideas he was building on:
Thomson (1897–1904): Discovered the electron and proposed the plum-pudding model — electrons embedded in a diffuse positive sphere. No nucleus. No empty space.
Rutherford (1911): Blew up the plum-pudding model with the gold-foil experiment. Showed that almost all the atom's mass is concentrated in a tiny, dense, positively charged nucleus, and electrons occupy the vast empty space around it. But his model could not explain how electrons stayed in orbit without radiating energy and crashing.
Planck (1900) + Einstein (1905): Energy comes in discrete packets (quanta). Light is not a continuous wave — it consists of photons, each carrying energy .
Bohr's synthesis (1913): Took Rutherford's nuclear structure + Planck–Einstein quantisation + the experimental data on hydrogen's line spectrum, and wove them into a self-consistent model. The key leap: he simply assumed that only certain orbits are allowed — those where the electron's angular momentum is a whole-number multiple of . This assumption had no classical justification. But it worked.

Why Classical Physics Predicts Atoms Cannot Exist
An electron moving in a circular orbit is constantly accelerating toward the nucleus (centripetal acceleration). Maxwell's equations of electrodynamics say that any accelerating charged particle must radiate energy as electromagnetic waves.
If an orbiting electron radiates energy, it slows down. As it slows, it spirals inward. Calculations show it should crash into the nucleus in about seconds — a hundred-millionth of a second.
Atoms have been around for 13.8 billion years. Clearly, something is wrong with applying classical physics here. Bohr's bold fix: declare that certain orbits are forbidden from radiating, simply because their angular momentum satisfies a quantum condition.
Bohr's Four Postulates
Postulate i — Stationary Orbits (Allowed States)
An electron in a hydrogen atom can move around the nucleus in circular paths of fixed radius and fixed energy. These paths are called orbits, stationary states, or allowed energy states. The orbits are arranged concentrically around the nucleus, like rings. As long as the electron stays in one orbit, it neither gains nor loses energy — which is why these are called stationary states (the electron itself still moves, but its energy is stationary).
Postulate ii — No Radiation While in Orbit; Quanta at Transitions
The energy of an electron in an allowed orbit does not change with time — it does not continuously radiate (defying classical electrodynamics). However:
- If the electron absorbs a quantum of energy, it jumps from a lower orbit to a higher orbit (excitation).
- If it falls from a higher orbit to a lower orbit, it emits that exact energy difference as a photon.
Crucially, the energy change does not happen gradually — it is instantaneous and comes in a single quantum. There is no in-between state.
Postulate iii — Bohr's Frequency Rule
When an electron transitions between two stationary states that differ in energy by , the frequency of the photon absorbed or emitted is given by:
Equation 2.10 — Bohr's Frequency Rule
E₁ = energy of the lower stationary state, E₂ = energy of the higher stationary state. h = Planck's constant = 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s. This is why atoms emit only specific frequencies — only specific ΔE values are possible.
Postulate iv — Quantised Angular Momentum (The Key Assumption)
This is the quantum heart of Bohr's model. An electron can only move in orbits where its angular momentum is an integer multiple of .
Recall: for an electron of mass moving in a circular orbit of radius with speed , the moment of inertia is and the angular velocity is , so:
Bohr's quantisation condition says this must equal a whole-number multiple of :
Equation 2.11 — Angular Momentum Quantisation
n is called the Principal Quantum Number. It labels which orbit the electron is in. The smallest allowed orbit is n = 1 (ground state). This equation has no derivation — it was Bohr's postulate, justified only by its results.
AI Generation Prompt
Bohr atomic model diagram for hydrogen. Central nucleus shown as a small bright orange sphere labelled 'Nucleus (+e)'. Surrounding it, four concentric circular orbits drawn as clean white rings, labelled n=1 (innermost), n=2, n=3, n=4 (outermost). A small blue sphere (electron) shown on the n=1 orbit with a curved arrow indicating circular motion. Show one upward transition arrow from n=1 to n=3 with a wavy photon arrow pointing inward (absorption, blue colour, labelled 'Energy absorbed = hν'). Show one downward transition arrow from n=3 to n=2 with a wavy photon arrow pointing outward (emission, red colour, labelled 'Energy emitted = hν'). Label each orbit with its radius: n=1 → a₀=52.9 pm, n=2 → 4a₀, n=3 → 9a₀, n=4 → 16a₀. Dark background, orange accent labels, clean technical illustration style.
Deriving the Key Results
Radius of the nth Orbit
The electron stays in a circular orbit because the electrostatic attraction toward the nucleus exactly provides the centripetal force needed for circular motion:
where is Coulomb's constant and is the electron charge. From Bohr's quantisation (Eq. 2.11):
Substituting (ii) into (i) and solving for gives:
AI Generation Prompt
Blackboard-style step-by-step mathematical derivation of the radius of the nth Bohr orbit. Show all steps clearly written in chalk-style on a dark background. Step 1: Force balance — ke²/r² = m_e v²/r, simplify to ke² = m_e v² r. Step 2: From angular momentum quantization — m_e v r = nh/2π, so v = nh/(2π m_e r). Step 3: Substitute v into force balance — ke² = m_e × [nh/(2π m_e r)]² × r. Step 4: Simplify — ke² = n²h²/(4π² m_e r), so r = n²h²/(4π² m_e ke²). Step 5: Define a₀ = h²/(4π² m_e ke²) = 52.9 pm, so r_n = n² a₀. Box the final result: r_n = n² a₀. Dark background, orange accent labels, clean technical illustration style.
Equation 2.12 — Radius of nth Orbit
a₀ = 52.9 pm is the Bohr radius — radius of the first (ground state) orbit. r₁ = 52.9 pm, r₂ = 4 × 52.9 = 211.6 pm, r₃ = 9 × 52.9 = 476.1 pm. As n increases, the radius grows as n² — so higher orbits are much larger.
Velocity of the nth Orbit
Now substitute the result back into the quantisation condition :
Substituting the known values of , , and :
AI Generation Prompt
Blackboard-style step-by-step mathematical derivation of the velocity of the nth Bohr orbit. Chalk-style on dark background. Step 1: From angular momentum quantization — v = nh / (2π m_e r). Step 2: Substitute r_n = n² a₀ — v_n = nh / (2π m_e n² a₀) = h / (2π m_e n a₀). Step 3: Substitute values — h = 6.626×10⁻³⁴ J·s, m_e = 9.109×10⁻³¹ kg, a₀ = 52.9×10⁻¹² m. Step 4: Calculate v₁ = 2.18 × 10⁶ m/s. Step 5: General result — v_n = 2.18×10⁶ / n m/s. Observation: velocity decreases as n increases (higher orbits, slower electrons). Box the final result: v_n = 2.18×10⁶ / n m s⁻¹. Dark background, orange accent labels, clean technical illustration style.
Velocity of nth Orbit
v₁ = 2.18 × 10⁶ m/s (about 0.73% the speed of light). v₂ = 1.09 × 10⁶ m/s, v₃ = 0.727 × 10⁶ m/s. Velocity decreases as n increases — electrons in outer orbits move more slowly. Velocity also increases with Z: for hydrogen-like ions, v_n = 2.18 × 10⁶ × Z/n m/s.
Energy of the nth Orbit
The total mechanical energy of the electron is the sum of its kinetic and potential energies. The potential energy is negative (attractive force):
From the force balance, , so :
Substituting and defining :
AI Generation Prompt
Blackboard-style step-by-step derivation of energy of the nth Bohr orbit. Chalk-style writing on dark background. Step 1: Total energy E = KE + PE = (1/2)m_e v² - ke²/r. Step 2: From force balance — ke²/r = m_e v², so KE = (1/2)ke²/r. Step 3: E = (1/2)ke²/r - ke²/r = -ke²/(2r). Step 4: Substitute r_n = n²a₀ — E_n = -ke²/(2n²a₀). Step 5: Define R_H = ke²/(2a₀) = 2.18×10⁻¹⁸ J. Step 6: Final result — E_n = -R_H/n² = -2.18×10⁻¹⁸/n² J. Show energy values: E₁ = -2.18×10⁻¹⁸ J, E₂ = -0.545×10⁻¹⁸ J. Box the result: E_n = -R_H(1/n²). Side note: KE = -E_n (positive), PE = 2E_n (negative), |PE| = 2|KE|. Dark background, orange accent labels, clean technical illustration style.
Equation 2.13 — Energy of nth Orbit
R_H = 2.18 × 10⁻¹⁸ J is the Rydberg constant (energy form). E₁ = -2.18 × 10⁻¹⁸ J (ground state — most negative, most stable). E₂ = -2.18×10⁻¹⁸ × (1/4) = -0.545 × 10⁻¹⁸ J. E_∞ = 0 (ionised hydrogen — electron free from nucleus).
What Does Negative Energy Mean?
The reference point (zero energy) is defined as a free electron at rest, infinitely far from the nucleus (, ).
Extension to Hydrogen-Like Ions
Bohr's model also applies to any ion with just one electron — called hydrogen-like species: (), (), (), etc. The nuclear charge simply replaces in the Coulomb force:
- Energy gets more negative as increases (electron more tightly bound to a higher-charge nucleus)
- Orbit radius gets smaller as increases (stronger pull → smaller orbit)
- Velocity increases with (stronger pull → faster orbit to maintain balance)
Equations 2.14 & 2.15 — Hydrogen-Like Ions
Z = atomic number of the ion. For He⁺ (Z=2): E₁ = -2.18×10⁻¹⁸ × 4 = -8.72×10⁻¹⁸ J (4× more negative than H). For He⁺: r₁ = 52.9/2 = 26.45 pm (half the Bohr radius — tighter orbit).
Explaining the Line Spectrum of Hydrogen
This is Bohr's greatest triumph. The line spectrum — which Balmer and Rydberg described with empirical formulas but could not explain — follows directly from Bohr's energy levels.
When an electron transitions from an initial orbit to a final orbit , the energy difference is:
- Emission (): electron falls to a lower orbit, is negative, energy is released as a photon.
- Absorption (): electron jumps to a higher orbit, is positive, energy is absorbed from a photon.
The frequency and wavenumber of the photon are:
Equations 2.16–2.21 — Transition Energy, Frequency, Wavenumber
The wavenumber 1.09677 × 10⁷ m⁻¹ = 109,677 cm⁻¹ is exactly the Rydberg constant R∞ that Rydberg found empirically in 1888. Bohr derived it from first principles in 1913 — a stunning validation of the model.
Every spectral series of hydrogen is now understood as transitions into a particular final orbit:
- Lyman (): transitions from into the ground state → high-energy UV photons
- Balmer (): transitions from into → visible photons (the four coloured lines Balmer saw)
- Paschen (), Brackett (), Pfund (): infrared photons
The brightness of each spectral line depends on the number of atoms making that particular transition — more atoms making the same jump means a more intense line.
The fact that Bohr's formula gives exactly Rydberg's empirical constant ( m) was electrifying. A formula derived from quantum postulates perfectly matched a constant measured in the lab decades earlier.
Limitations of Bohr's Model
Bohr's model was a brilliant breakthrough, but it came with serious limitations:
1. Fails for multi-electron atoms
Bohr's model works for hydrogen () and hydrogen-like ions (one electron), but breaks down completely for atoms with two or more electrons. Electron–electron repulsions create interactions the model ignores entirely.
2. Cannot explain fine structure of spectral lines
When instruments of higher resolution examine hydrogen's spectral lines, each 'line' is actually a cluster of closely-spaced lines (doublets and triplets). Bohr's model predicts single lines and cannot account for this fine structure.
3. Cannot explain the Zeeman and Stark effects
In a magnetic field, spectral lines split into multiple components (Zeeman effect). In an electric field, they split differently (Stark effect). Bohr's model has no mechanism to explain these splittings.
4. Contradicts Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
The concept of a fixed, well-defined circular orbit implies that you know both the electron's position and momentum simultaneously with perfect precision. Heisenberg proved this is impossible — you cannot know both at once. An orbit is fundamentally a classical concept that doesn't apply to quantum particles.
5. Ignores the wave nature of the electron
de Broglie showed (1924) that electrons have wave properties. A particle with wave nature cannot be confined to a well-defined circular trajectory. Bohr's model treats electrons purely as particles.
6. Cannot explain chemical bonding or molecular shapes
Bohr's model says nothing about how atoms share electrons to form molecules, or why molecules have specific shapes.
Q1.According to Bohr's model, the radius of the 3rd orbit of () is: