Ch. 2 | Structure of Atom0/15

Bohr's Model of the Atom

From Rutherford's problem to quantum orbits — and why Bohr was right for all the wrong reasons

A 27-year-old who rewrote atomic physics in one year

In 1911, a young Danish physicist named Niels Bohr arrived in Cambridge to work with the legendary J.J. Thomson — discoverer of the electron. The collaboration didn't click. Within months, Bohr moved to Manchester to join Ernest Rutherford, who had just unveiled his nuclear model of the atom.

Rutherford's atom had a problem no one could solve: classical physics predicted that an electron orbiting a nucleus should spiral inward and crash into it within a fraction of a nanosecond. Atoms shouldn't exist — yet here we all are.

Bohr spent 1912–1913 combining Rutherford's nuclear model with Planck's quantum idea and Einstein's photon concept. The result — published in 1913 when he was just 27 — was the first model to correctly predict the hydrogen spectrum, every line of it. He received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1922.

To understand where Bohr's model came from, you need to see the chain of ideas he was building on:

Thomson (1897–1904): Discovered the electron and proposed the plum-pudding model — electrons embedded in a diffuse positive sphere. No nucleus. No empty space.

Rutherford (1911): Blew up the plum-pudding model with the gold-foil experiment. Showed that almost all the atom's mass is concentrated in a tiny, dense, positively charged nucleus, and electrons occupy the vast empty space around it. But his model could not explain how electrons stayed in orbit without radiating energy and crashing.

Planck (1900) + Einstein (1905): Energy comes in discrete packets (quanta). Light is not a continuous wave — it consists of photons, each carrying energy E=hνE = h\nu.

Bohr's synthesis (1913): Took Rutherford's nuclear structure + Planck–Einstein quantisation + the experimental data on hydrogen's line spectrum, and wove them into a self-consistent model. The key leap: he simply assumed that only certain orbits are allowed — those where the electron's angular momentum is a whole-number multiple of h2π\frac{h}{2\pi}. This assumption had no classical justification. But it worked.

Portrait of Niels Bohr and the intellectual lineage from Thomson to Rutherford to Bohr
📸 The intellectual lineage: Thomson discovered the electron → Rutherford found the nucleus → Bohr quantised the orbits.

Why Classical Physics Predicts Atoms Cannot Exist

An electron moving in a circular orbit is constantly accelerating toward the nucleus (centripetal acceleration). Maxwell's equations of electrodynamics say that any accelerating charged particle must radiate energy as electromagnetic waves.

If an orbiting electron radiates energy, it slows down. As it slows, it spirals inward. Calculations show it should crash into the nucleus in about 10810^{-8} seconds — a hundred-millionth of a second.

Atoms have been around for 13.8 billion years. Clearly, something is wrong with applying classical physics here. Bohr's bold fix: declare that certain orbits are forbidden from radiating, simply because their angular momentum satisfies a quantum condition.

Bohr's Four Postulates

Postulate i — Stationary Orbits (Allowed States)

An electron in a hydrogen atom can move around the nucleus in circular paths of fixed radius and fixed energy. These paths are called orbits, stationary states, or allowed energy states. The orbits are arranged concentrically around the nucleus, like rings. As long as the electron stays in one orbit, it neither gains nor loses energy — which is why these are called stationary states (the electron itself still moves, but its energy is stationary).


Postulate ii — No Radiation While in Orbit; Quanta at Transitions

The energy of an electron in an allowed orbit does not change with time — it does not continuously radiate (defying classical electrodynamics). However:

  • If the electron absorbs a quantum of energy, it jumps from a lower orbit to a higher orbit (excitation).
  • If it falls from a higher orbit to a lower orbit, it emits that exact energy difference as a photon.

Crucially, the energy change does not happen gradually — it is instantaneous and comes in a single quantum. There is no in-between state.

Postulate iii — Bohr's Frequency Rule

When an electron transitions between two stationary states that differ in energy by ΔE\Delta E, the frequency ν\nu of the photon absorbed or emitted is given by:

ν=ΔEh=E2E1h\nu = \frac{\Delta E}{h} = \frac{E_2 - E_1}{h}

Equation 2.10 — Bohr's Frequency Rule

E₁ = energy of the lower stationary state, E₂ = energy of the higher stationary state. h = Planck's constant = 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s. This is why atoms emit only specific frequencies — only specific ΔE values are possible.

Postulate iv — Quantised Angular Momentum (The Key Assumption)

This is the quantum heart of Bohr's model. An electron can only move in orbits where its angular momentum is an integer multiple of h2π\frac{h}{2\pi}.

Recall: for an electron of mass mem_e moving in a circular orbit of radius rr with speed vv, the moment of inertia is I=mer2I = m_e r^2 and the angular velocity is ω=v/r\omega = v/r, so:

angular momentum=I×ω=mer2×vr=mevr\text{angular momentum} = I \times \omega = m_e r^2 \times \frac{v}{r} = m_e v r

Bohr's quantisation condition says this must equal a whole-number multiple of h/2πh/2\pi:

mevr=nh2πn=1,2,3,m_e v r = n \cdot \frac{h}{2\pi} \qquad n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots

Equation 2.11 — Angular Momentum Quantisation

n is called the Principal Quantum Number. It labels which orbit the electron is in. The smallest allowed orbit is n = 1 (ground state). This equation has no derivation — it was Bohr's postulate, justified only by its results.

🖼 Image PendingBohr model of hydrogen atom showing concentric circular orbits labelled n=1 to n=4 around a nucleus

AI Generation Prompt

Bohr atomic model diagram for hydrogen. Central nucleus shown as a small bright orange sphere labelled 'Nucleus (+e)'. Surrounding it, four concentric circular orbits drawn as clean white rings, labelled n=1 (innermost), n=2, n=3, n=4 (outermost). A small blue sphere (electron) shown on the n=1 orbit with a curved arrow indicating circular motion. Show one upward transition arrow from n=1 to n=3 with a wavy photon arrow pointing inward (absorption, blue colour, labelled 'Energy absorbed = hν'). Show one downward transition arrow from n=3 to n=2 with a wavy photon arrow pointing outward (emission, red colour, labelled 'Energy emitted = hν'). Label each orbit with its radius: n=1 → a₀=52.9 pm, n=2 → 4a₀, n=3 → 9a₀, n=4 → 16a₀. Dark background, orange accent labels, clean technical illustration style.

📸 Bohr's model of the hydrogen atom. Each orbit (n = 1, 2, 3, …) is a stationary state of fixed radius and energy. Transitions between orbits produce photon emission or absorption.

Deriving the Key Results

Radius of the nth Orbit

The electron stays in a circular orbit because the electrostatic attraction toward the nucleus exactly provides the centripetal force needed for circular motion:

ke2r2=mev2rke2=mev2r(i)\frac{ke^2}{r^2} = \frac{m_e v^2}{r} \quad \Rightarrow \quad ke^2 = m_e v^2 r \quad \cdots (i)

where k=14πε0k = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} is Coulomb's constant and ee is the electron charge. From Bohr's quantisation (Eq. 2.11):

mevr=nh2πv=nh2πmer(ii)m_e v r = \frac{nh}{2\pi} \quad \Rightarrow \quad v = \frac{nh}{2\pi m_e r} \quad \cdots (ii)

Substituting (ii) into (i) and solving for rr gives:

🖼 Image PendingHandwritten derivation of radius of nth Bohr orbit

AI Generation Prompt

Blackboard-style step-by-step mathematical derivation of the radius of the nth Bohr orbit. Show all steps clearly written in chalk-style on a dark background. Step 1: Force balance — ke²/r² = m_e v²/r, simplify to ke² = m_e v² r. Step 2: From angular momentum quantization — m_e v r = nh/2π, so v = nh/(2π m_e r). Step 3: Substitute v into force balance — ke² = m_e × [nh/(2π m_e r)]² × r. Step 4: Simplify — ke² = n²h²/(4π² m_e r), so r = n²h²/(4π² m_e ke²). Step 5: Define a₀ = h²/(4π² m_e ke²) = 52.9 pm, so r_n = n² a₀. Box the final result: r_n = n² a₀. Dark background, orange accent labels, clean technical illustration style.

📸 Step-by-step derivation of r_n = n² a₀ — your handwritten notes go here.
rn=n2a0a0=52.9 pmn=1,2,3,r_n = n^2 a_0 \qquad a_0 = 52.9 \text{ pm} \qquad n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots

Equation 2.12 — Radius of nth Orbit

a₀ = 52.9 pm is the Bohr radius — radius of the first (ground state) orbit. r₁ = 52.9 pm, r₂ = 4 × 52.9 = 211.6 pm, r₃ = 9 × 52.9 = 476.1 pm. As n increases, the radius grows as n² — so higher orbits are much larger.

The Bohr Radius — Most Stable State

The first orbit (n=1n = 1) has radius r1=a0=52.9r_1 = a_0 = 52.9 pm. This is called the Bohr orbit or Bohr radius. Under normal conditions, the electron in a hydrogen atom is found in this innermost orbit — the ground state.

As nn increases: r2=4a0r_2 = 4a_0, r3=9a0r_3 = 9a_0, r4=16a0r_4 = 16a_0. The radius grows as n2n^2, so the electron moves further from the nucleus at higher orbits. As nn \to \infty, rr \to \infty — the electron escapes the nucleus (ionisation).

Velocity of the nth Orbit

Now substitute the result rn=n2a0r_n = n^2 a_0 back into the quantisation condition v=nh2πmerv = \frac{nh}{2\pi m_e r}:

vn=nh2πmen2a0=h2πmena0v_n = \frac{nh}{2\pi m_e \cdot n^2 a_0} = \frac{h}{2\pi m_e n a_0}

Substituting the known values of hh, mem_e, and a0a_0:

🖼 Image PendingHandwritten derivation of velocity of nth Bohr orbit

AI Generation Prompt

Blackboard-style step-by-step mathematical derivation of the velocity of the nth Bohr orbit. Chalk-style on dark background. Step 1: From angular momentum quantization — v = nh / (2π m_e r). Step 2: Substitute r_n = n² a₀ — v_n = nh / (2π m_e n² a₀) = h / (2π m_e n a₀). Step 3: Substitute values — h = 6.626×10⁻³⁴ J·s, m_e = 9.109×10⁻³¹ kg, a₀ = 52.9×10⁻¹² m. Step 4: Calculate v₁ = 2.18 × 10⁶ m/s. Step 5: General result — v_n = 2.18×10⁶ / n m/s. Observation: velocity decreases as n increases (higher orbits, slower electrons). Box the final result: v_n = 2.18×10⁶ / n m s⁻¹. Dark background, orange accent labels, clean technical illustration style.

📸 Derivation of v_n — your handwritten notes go here.
vn=2.18×106n m s1v_n = \frac{2.18 \times 10^6}{n} \text{ m s}^{-1}

Velocity of nth Orbit

v₁ = 2.18 × 10⁶ m/s (about 0.73% the speed of light). v₂ = 1.09 × 10⁶ m/s, v₃ = 0.727 × 10⁶ m/s. Velocity decreases as n increases — electrons in outer orbits move more slowly. Velocity also increases with Z: for hydrogen-like ions, v_n = 2.18 × 10⁶ × Z/n m/s.

Energy of the nth Orbit

The total mechanical energy of the electron is the sum of its kinetic and potential energies. The potential energy is negative (attractive force):

E=KE+PE=12mev2+(ke2r)E = KE + PE = \frac{1}{2}m_e v^2 + \left(-\frac{ke^2}{r}\right)

From the force balance, ke2=mev2rke^2 = m_e v^2 r, so 12mev2=ke22r\frac{1}{2}m_e v^2 = \frac{ke^2}{2r}:

E=ke22rke2r=ke22rE = \frac{ke^2}{2r} - \frac{ke^2}{r} = -\frac{ke^2}{2r}

Substituting rn=n2a0r_n = n^2 a_0 and defining RH=ke22a0R_H = \frac{ke^2}{2a_0}:

🖼 Image PendingHandwritten derivation of energy of nth Bohr orbit

AI Generation Prompt

Blackboard-style step-by-step derivation of energy of the nth Bohr orbit. Chalk-style writing on dark background. Step 1: Total energy E = KE + PE = (1/2)m_e v² - ke²/r. Step 2: From force balance — ke²/r = m_e v², so KE = (1/2)ke²/r. Step 3: E = (1/2)ke²/r - ke²/r = -ke²/(2r). Step 4: Substitute r_n = n²a₀ — E_n = -ke²/(2n²a₀). Step 5: Define R_H = ke²/(2a₀) = 2.18×10⁻¹⁸ J. Step 6: Final result — E_n = -R_H/n² = -2.18×10⁻¹⁸/n² J. Show energy values: E₁ = -2.18×10⁻¹⁸ J, E₂ = -0.545×10⁻¹⁸ J. Box the result: E_n = -R_H(1/n²). Side note: KE = -E_n (positive), PE = 2E_n (negative), |PE| = 2|KE|. Dark background, orange accent labels, clean technical illustration style.

📸 Full energy derivation — your handwritten notes go here.
En=RH(1n2)=2.18×1018n2 Jn=1,2,3,E_n = -R_H \left(\frac{1}{n^2}\right) = -\frac{2.18 \times 10^{-18}}{n^2} \text{ J} \qquad n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots

Equation 2.13 — Energy of nth Orbit

R_H = 2.18 × 10⁻¹⁸ J is the Rydberg constant (energy form). E₁ = -2.18 × 10⁻¹⁸ J (ground state — most negative, most stable). E₂ = -2.18×10⁻¹⁸ × (1/4) = -0.545 × 10⁻¹⁸ J. E_∞ = 0 (ionised hydrogen — electron free from nucleus).

What Does Negative Energy Mean?

The reference point (zero energy) is defined as a free electron at rest, infinitely far from the nucleus (n=n = \infty, E=0E_\infty = 0).

Extension to Hydrogen-Like Ions

Bohr's model also applies to any ion with just one electron — called hydrogen-like species: HeX+\ce{He+} (Z=2Z=2), LiX2+\ce{Li^{2+}} (Z=3Z=3), BeX3+\ce{Be^{3+}} (Z=4Z=4), etc. The nuclear charge ZeZe simply replaces ee in the Coulomb force:

  • Energy gets more negative as ZZ increases (electron more tightly bound to a higher-charge nucleus)
  • Orbit radius gets smaller as ZZ increases (stronger pull → smaller orbit)
  • Velocity increases with ZZ (stronger pull → faster orbit to maintain balance)
En=2.18×1018(Z2n2) Jrn=52.9n2Z pmE_n = -2.18 \times 10^{-18} \left(\frac{Z^2}{n^2}\right) \text{ J} \qquad r_n = \frac{52.9 \, n^2}{Z} \text{ pm}

Equations 2.14 & 2.15 — Hydrogen-Like Ions

Z = atomic number of the ion. For He⁺ (Z=2): E₁ = -2.18×10⁻¹⁸ × 4 = -8.72×10⁻¹⁸ J (4× more negative than H). For He⁺: r₁ = 52.9/2 = 26.45 pm (half the Bohr radius — tighter orbit).

Explaining the Line Spectrum of Hydrogen

This is Bohr's greatest triumph. The line spectrum — which Balmer and Rydberg described with empirical formulas but could not explain — follows directly from Bohr's energy levels.

When an electron transitions from an initial orbit nin_i to a final orbit nfn_f, the energy difference is:

ΔE=EfEi=RHnf2(RHni2)=RH(1ni21nf2)\Delta E = E_f - E_i = -\frac{R_H}{n_f^2} - \left(-\frac{R_H}{n_i^2}\right) = R_H\left(\frac{1}{n_i^2} - \frac{1}{n_f^2}\right)

  • Emission (ni>nfn_i > n_f): electron falls to a lower orbit, ΔE\Delta E is negative, energy is released as a photon.
  • Absorption (nf>nin_f > n_i): electron jumps to a higher orbit, ΔE\Delta E is positive, energy is absorbed from a photon.

The frequency and wavenumber of the photon are:

ΔE=2.18×1018(1ni21nf2) Jν=ΔEh=3.29×1015(1ni21nf2) Hzνˉ=νc=1.09677×107(1ni21nf2) m1\Delta E = 2.18 \times 10^{-18} \left(\frac{1}{n_i^2} - \frac{1}{n_f^2}\right) \text{ J}\\[10pt]\nu = \frac{\Delta E}{h} = 3.29 \times 10^{15} \left(\frac{1}{n_i^2} - \frac{1}{n_f^2}\right) \text{ Hz}\\[10pt]\bar{\nu} = \frac{\nu}{c} = 1.09677 \times 10^{7} \left(\frac{1}{n_i^2} - \frac{1}{n_f^2}\right) \text{ m}^{-1}

Equations 2.16–2.21 — Transition Energy, Frequency, Wavenumber

The wavenumber 1.09677 × 10⁷ m⁻¹ = 109,677 cm⁻¹ is exactly the Rydberg constant R∞ that Rydberg found empirically in 1888. Bohr derived it from first principles in 1913 — a stunning validation of the model.

Every spectral series of hydrogen is now understood as transitions into a particular final orbit:

  • Lyman (nf=1n_f = 1): transitions from ni2n_i \geq 2 into the ground state → high-energy UV photons
  • Balmer (nf=2n_f = 2): transitions from ni3n_i \geq 3 into n=2n=2 → visible photons (the four coloured lines Balmer saw)
  • Paschen (nf=3n_f = 3), Brackett (nf=4n_f = 4), Pfund (nf=5n_f = 5): infrared photons

The brightness of each spectral line depends on the number of atoms making that particular transition — more atoms making the same jump means a more intense line.

The fact that Bohr's formula gives exactly Rydberg's empirical constant (1.09677×1071.09677 \times 10^7 m1^{-1}) was electrifying. A formula derived from quantum postulates perfectly matched a constant measured in the lab decades earlier.

Limitations of Bohr's Model

Bohr's model was a brilliant breakthrough, but it came with serious limitations:

1. Fails for multi-electron atoms
Bohr's model works for hydrogen (Z=1Z=1) and hydrogen-like ions (one electron), but breaks down completely for atoms with two or more electrons. Electron–electron repulsions create interactions the model ignores entirely.

2. Cannot explain fine structure of spectral lines
When instruments of higher resolution examine hydrogen's spectral lines, each 'line' is actually a cluster of closely-spaced lines (doublets and triplets). Bohr's model predicts single lines and cannot account for this fine structure.

3. Cannot explain the Zeeman and Stark effects
In a magnetic field, spectral lines split into multiple components (Zeeman effect). In an electric field, they split differently (Stark effect). Bohr's model has no mechanism to explain these splittings.

4. Contradicts Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
The concept of a fixed, well-defined circular orbit implies that you know both the electron's position and momentum simultaneously with perfect precision. Heisenberg proved this is impossible — you cannot know both at once. An orbit is fundamentally a classical concept that doesn't apply to quantum particles.

5. Ignores the wave nature of the electron
de Broglie showed (1924) that electrons have wave properties. A particle with wave nature cannot be confined to a well-defined circular trajectory. Bohr's model treats electrons purely as particles.

6. Cannot explain chemical bonding or molecular shapes
Bohr's model says nothing about how atoms share electrons to form molecules, or why molecules have specific shapes.

JEE / NEET Exam Insights — Bohr's ModelJEE / NEET
Most tested formula: En=13.6n2E_n = -\frac{13.6}{n^2} eV (same as Eq 2.13, just converted: 2.18×10182.18 \times 10^{-18} J ÷1.6×1019\div\, 1.6 \times 10^{-19} J/eV =13.6= 13.6 eV). Memorise this in eV — most JEE problems use it.
Radius shortcut: rn=0.529×n2r_n = 0.529 \times n^2 Å =0.529n2×1010= 0.529 n^2 \times 10^{-10} m. For H-like ions: rn=0.529n2/Zr_n = 0.529 n^2 / Z Å.
Energy of H-like ions: En=13.6Z2n2E_n = -\frac{13.6 Z^2}{n^2} eV. For HeX+\ce{He+} (Z=2Z=2): E1=13.6×4=54.4E_1 = -13.6 \times 4 = -54.4 eV.
Ionisation energy = E1|E_1| for that species. IE of H = 13.6 eV. IE of HeX+\ce{He+} = 54.4 eV.
Number of spectral lines: When an electron falls from n=pn = p to n=1n = 1, the maximum number of lines produced = p(p1)2\frac{p(p-1)}{2}.
Classic trap: 'Bohr's model is valid for which species?' → Only for hydrogen and hydrogen-like (1-electron) species: H\ce{H}, HeX+\ce{He+}, LiX2+\ce{Li^{2+}}, BeX3+\ce{Be^{3+}} — NOT for He\ce{He}, Li\ce{Li} etc.
Bohr's model limitation questions are very common in NEET — always mention it fails for multi-electron atoms, fine structure, and violates Heisenberg's principle.
Quick Check

Q1.According to Bohr's model, the radius of the 3rd orbit of HeX+\ce{He+} (Z=2Z = 2) is: